PickAIModel.com - GPT-5.4 Model Detail

GPT-5.4

Item: GPT-5.4
Rating: 68.1
Author: PickAIModel.com

OpenAI

Replacement delta versus GPT-5.2: Compared with GPT-5.2, the replaced model from the previous published roster.

Verified evidenceDecision brief

Quality Score

68.1Falling -24.1

PickAI Conversation Value

~667 conversations equivalentRising +11.6

Ease of use: 90% | Ready to use

Responsiveness

Unavailable1.3s start | 73 tok/s

Verified

Apr 7, 2026

Normal use: ~667 conversations equivalent at published API rates.

PickAI Conversation Value measures buying power at API rates. Ease of use is shown separately as a buyer-accessibility signal.

Replacement reference: GPT-5.2. Quality delta 2.8, value delta 7.6.

Standout feature

03 - GPT-5.4 (OpenAI)

Strongest terminal and computer-use execution - operates IDEs and browsers directly Broadest third-party ecosystem - most tools, plugins, and integrations are built around it Canvas collaborative editing environment for iterative document work Intelligent internal routing - simple queries get fast responses, complex ones get deeper processing Most mature enterprise deployment history of any frontier model

PickAI benchmark

GPT-5.4 conversation value at your pace

Move the usage slider to see how the monthly price translates into PickAI Conversation Value at published API rates. Ease of use stays separate so you can distinguish buying power from buyer accessibility.

PickAI conversation value

~667 conversations equivalent

Usage intensity

LightNormalHeavy

One normal prompt, one full reply, and a couple of follow-up turns.

Selected tier

ChatGPT Plus

PickAI Conversation Value

~667 conversations equivalent

Ease of use

90% | Ready to use

Normal use: ~667 conversations equivalent at published API rates.

This estimate uses the shared normal conversation basket: 1,200 input tokens and 1,800 output tokens, or 3k tokens total. Standard conversation cost = (input tokens × API input price + output tokens × API output price) / 1,000,000.

API pricing basis: $2.5 / 1M input, $15 / 1M output

PickAI Conversation Value measures buying power at API rates. Ease of use is shown separately as a buyer-accessibility signal.

90% · Ready to use. Based on a hosted consumer app, no technical setup, and a free tier or trial.

Pricing calculator tiers for GPT-5.4.
Tier	Monthly price	Ease of use	PickAI Conversation Value	Rate note
Free Free tier	$0	90% \| Ready to use	Free tier	Free access exists, but the vendor does not publish a fixed monthly token allowance for this hosted tier and practical limits vary by workload.
ChatGPT PlusPrimary Usage limits not disclosed	$20	90% \| Ready to use	~667 conversations equivalent	Usage limits vary by workload and should be checked against the vendor current plan controls.

Consumer access

Use now

Open ChatGPT

Monthly price: ChatGPT Plus: $20/month
App access: ChatGPT

Verified vendor fact

Consumer plan pricing is grounded in the current official vendor plan page.

Verified vendor fact

Hosted app availability is grounded in the current official vendor surface.

What it feels like

Task fit

Images and files
Speed: Response speed is grounded in the current OpenRouter performance page for this model.
Free plan limits: Free access exists, but practical limits vary by workload and current vendor policy.
Writing quality: Writing quality guidance updates after the editorial overlay refresh.

Editorial estimate

This is a buyer-facing summary of the hosted product experience, not a verbatim vendor claim.

For cautious buyers

Trust

Privacy: Privacy guidance remains conservative and should be checked against the vendor current controls.
Languages: Language support guidance remains conservative until refreshed buyer notes are generated.
Context window: Context guidance reflects the current acquired retrieval evidence for this model.

Editorial estimate

Privacy guidance is summarized conservatively for buyers and should be checked against the vendor current controls.

Response speed, writing quality, and privacy are subjective buyer-facing editorial notes. They are intentionally not part of the numeric benchmark score.

Official ecosystem

Official tools and surfaces

Verified vendor fact0 tools

These are the verified first-party tools or official product surfaces currently listed for GPT-5.4. If there is no verified specialized tool beyond a general chat surface, this section stays minimal.

Only verified first-party surfaces are listed.

No verified specialized tools are listed in the current snapshot for this model.

Editorial Verdict

AI-generated

GPT-5.4 is one of the best choices for people who want an AI that feels smart, reliable, and easy to use without needing technical knowledge. Compared with many other AI models, it stands out for its stronger reasoning, better memory in longer conversations, more natural replies, and broader ability to help with real everyday tasks. Whether you need help writing, researching, planning, summarising documents, solving problems, or getting organised, GPT-5.4 does all of it in one place at a very high level. It is not just for asking questions - it can also help take action and support more advanced workflows when needed. If you want a premium all-round AI assistant that is polished, versatile, and useful for both personal and professional life, GPT-5.4 is a compelling option and one of the safest buys in the market.

Pros

AI-generated

Source-backed benchmark and pricing inputs acquired during refresh.

Cons

AI-generated

Editorial guidance still depends on the separate AI overlay refresh.

Best For

AI-generated

General AI work

Not Ideal For

AI-generated

Unsupported use cases

Capability Dimensions

Sub-scores

Reasoning & Logic60%

Coding & Math97%

Factual Grounding89%

Context Window69%

Speed / Responsiveness0%

Continue Research

Use this model page with the wider roster and methodology.

Leaderboard

Return to the published top 10 and compare this model against the roster.

Model index

Browse the rest of the current published directory with pricing and app access.

Methodology

See how Quality and Value stay deterministic and separate.

Technical Benchmarks

Some benchmark rows come from current vendor-published comparison tables rather than neutral third-party testing. Each row links to its source so you can judge the evidence directly.

Technical benchmark details for this model.
Benchmark	Metric	Score	Source	Retrieved
Humanity's Last Exam Live source acquisition	Normalized quality input	41.6%	Artificial Analysis — GPT-5.4 evaluation HLE (41.6%) and GPQA Diamond (92.0%) from Artificial Analysis independent evaluation. SWE-bench Verified estimated from third-party evaluation (vals.ai); OpenAI published SWE-bench Pro at 57.7% — a harder variant not directly comparable with this roster. MRCR scores estimated from independent context-window evaluation data. Pricing confirmed from OpenAI API docs.	2026-03-30
SWE-bench Verified Live source acquisition	Normalized quality input	79.5%	Artificial Analysis — GPT-5.4 evaluation HLE (41.6%) and GPQA Diamond (92.0%) from Artificial Analysis independent evaluation. SWE-bench Verified estimated from third-party evaluation (vals.ai); OpenAI published SWE-bench Pro at 57.7% — a harder variant not directly comparable with this roster. MRCR scores estimated from independent context-window evaluation data. Pricing confirmed from OpenAI API docs.	2026-03-30
GPQA Diamond Live source acquisition	Normalized quality input	92.0%	Artificial Analysis — GPT-5.4 evaluation HLE (41.6%) and GPQA Diamond (92.0%) from Artificial Analysis independent evaluation. SWE-bench Verified estimated from third-party evaluation (vals.ai); OpenAI published SWE-bench Pro at 57.7% — a harder variant not directly comparable with this roster. MRCR scores estimated from independent context-window evaluation data. Pricing confirmed from OpenAI API docs.	2026-03-30
LiveCodeBench LiveCodeBench	Fresh coding problems	72.5%	LiveCodeBench official leaderboard Primary benchmark-maintainer leaderboard. Use the published model row and benchmark methodology as the canonical source.	2026-04-15
ARC-AGI-2 ARC-AGI-2 public leaderboard	Novel pattern reasoning	73.3%	ARC Prize leaderboard ARC-AGI-2 is shown as supplementary evidence only and is not currently included in the PickAI Quality Score.	2026-03-30
MathArena Expected Performance	Expected Performance	78.7%	MathArena models leaderboard MathArena is shown as supplementary evidence only and is not currently included in the PickAI Quality Score.	2026-04-08
Aider Polyglot Aider Polyglot	Multi-file coding	88.0%	Aider Polyglot official leaderboard First-party leaderboard maintained by the benchmark creators. Use the reported harness and published scores from Aider's own runs.	2026-04-15
MRCR v2 Live source acquisition	128k retrieval	85.2%	Artificial Analysis — GPT-5.4 evaluation HLE (41.6%) and GPQA Diamond (92.0%) from Artificial Analysis independent evaluation. SWE-bench Verified estimated from third-party evaluation (vals.ai); OpenAI published SWE-bench Pro at 57.7% — a harder variant not directly comparable with this roster. MRCR scores estimated from independent context-window evaluation data. Pricing confirmed from OpenAI API docs.	2026-03-30
MRCR v2 Live source acquisition	1M retrieval	33.0%	Artificial Analysis — GPT-5.4 evaluation HLE (41.6%) and GPQA Diamond (92.0%) from Artificial Analysis independent evaluation. SWE-bench Verified estimated from third-party evaluation (vals.ai); OpenAI published SWE-bench Pro at 57.7% — a harder variant not directly comparable with this roster. MRCR scores estimated from independent context-window evaluation data. Pricing confirmed from OpenAI API docs.	2026-03-30

Get started with GPT-5.4

Compare on leaderboard

Affiliate Disclosure

This model currently does not have an affiliate relationship. The button routes to the leaderboard for direct comparison.

Tier

Monthly price

Ease of use

PickAI Conversation Value

Rate note

Free

Free tier

90% | Ready to use

Free tier

Free access exists, but the vendor does not publish a fixed monthly token allowance for this hosted tier and practical limits vary by workload.

ChatGPT PlusPrimary

Usage limits not disclosed

$20

90% | Ready to use

~667 conversations equivalent

Usage limits vary by workload and should be checked against the vendor current plan controls.

Technical Benchmarks

Some benchmark rows come from current vendor-published comparison tables rather than neutral third-party testing. Each row links to its source so you can judge the evidence directly.

Technical benchmark details for this model.
Benchmark	Metric	Score	Source	Retrieved
Humanity's Last Exam Live source acquisition	Normalized quality input	41.6%	Artificial Analysis — GPT-5.4 evaluation HLE (41.6%) and GPQA Diamond (92.0%) from Artificial Analysis independent evaluation. SWE-bench Verified estimated from third-party evaluation (vals.ai); OpenAI published SWE-bench Pro at 57.7% — a harder variant not directly comparable with this roster. MRCR scores estimated from independent context-window evaluation data. Pricing confirmed from OpenAI API docs.	2026-03-30
SWE-bench Verified Live source acquisition	Normalized quality input	79.5%	Artificial Analysis — GPT-5.4 evaluation HLE (41.6%) and GPQA Diamond (92.0%) from Artificial Analysis independent evaluation. SWE-bench Verified estimated from third-party evaluation (vals.ai); OpenAI published SWE-bench Pro at 57.7% — a harder variant not directly comparable with this roster. MRCR scores estimated from independent context-window evaluation data. Pricing confirmed from OpenAI API docs.	2026-03-30
GPQA Diamond Live source acquisition	Normalized quality input	92.0%	Artificial Analysis — GPT-5.4 evaluation HLE (41.6%) and GPQA Diamond (92.0%) from Artificial Analysis independent evaluation. SWE-bench Verified estimated from third-party evaluation (vals.ai); OpenAI published SWE-bench Pro at 57.7% — a harder variant not directly comparable with this roster. MRCR scores estimated from independent context-window evaluation data. Pricing confirmed from OpenAI API docs.	2026-03-30
LiveCodeBench LiveCodeBench	Fresh coding problems	72.5%	LiveCodeBench official leaderboard Primary benchmark-maintainer leaderboard. Use the published model row and benchmark methodology as the canonical source.	2026-04-15
ARC-AGI-2 ARC-AGI-2 public leaderboard	Novel pattern reasoning	73.3%	ARC Prize leaderboard ARC-AGI-2 is shown as supplementary evidence only and is not currently included in the PickAI Quality Score.	2026-03-30
MathArena Expected Performance	Expected Performance	78.7%	MathArena models leaderboard MathArena is shown as supplementary evidence only and is not currently included in the PickAI Quality Score.	2026-04-08
Aider Polyglot Aider Polyglot	Multi-file coding	88.0%	Aider Polyglot official leaderboard First-party leaderboard maintained by the benchmark creators. Use the reported harness and published scores from Aider's own runs.	2026-04-15
MRCR v2 Live source acquisition	128k retrieval	85.2%	Artificial Analysis — GPT-5.4 evaluation HLE (41.6%) and GPQA Diamond (92.0%) from Artificial Analysis independent evaluation. SWE-bench Verified estimated from third-party evaluation (vals.ai); OpenAI published SWE-bench Pro at 57.7% — a harder variant not directly comparable with this roster. MRCR scores estimated from independent context-window evaluation data. Pricing confirmed from OpenAI API docs.	2026-03-30
MRCR v2 Live source acquisition	1M retrieval	33.0%	Artificial Analysis — GPT-5.4 evaluation HLE (41.6%) and GPQA Diamond (92.0%) from Artificial Analysis independent evaluation. SWE-bench Verified estimated from third-party evaluation (vals.ai); OpenAI published SWE-bench Pro at 57.7% — a harder variant not directly comparable with this roster. MRCR scores estimated from independent context-window evaluation data. Pricing confirmed from OpenAI API docs.	2026-03-30