Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
PickAIModel.com - Claude Opus 5 Model Detail
Anthropic
Normal use: ~392 chats at published API rates.
PickAI Conversation Value measures buying power at published API rates using the shared standard conversation basket.
Standout feature
Reviewing standard features
We are working on it.
PickAI benchmark
Move the usage slider to see how the monthly price translates into PickAI Conversation Value at published API rates.
PickAI conversation value
~392 chats
Usage intensity
One normal prompt, one full reply, and a couple of follow-up turns.
Selected tier
Claude Pro
PickAI Conversation Value
~392 chats
Standard basket
3K tokens/chat
Normal use: ~392 chats at published API rates.
This estimate uses the shared normal conversation basket: 1,200 input tokens and 1,800 output tokens, or 3k tokens total. Standard conversation cost = (input tokens × API input price + output tokens × API output price) / 1,000,000.
API pricing basis: $5 / 1M input, $25 / 1M output
PickAI Conversation Value measures buying power at published API rates using the shared standard conversation basket.
| Tier | Monthly price | PickAI Conversation Value | Standard basket | Rate note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Claude ProPrimary Usage limits not disclosed | $20 | ~392 chats | 3,000 tokens | Availability and rate limits vary by Claude plan and API usage tier. |
Consumer access
Consumer plan pricing is grounded in the current official vendor plan page.
Hosted app availability is grounded in the current official vendor surface.
What it feels like
Official ecosystem
These are the verified first-party tools or official product surfaces currently listed for Claude Opus 5. If there is no verified specialized tool beyond a general chat surface, this section stays minimal.
Only verified first-party surfaces are listed.
Claude Opus 5 combines a 1M-token context window with strong exact-variant HLE and SWE-Bench Pro results. Its $5 per million input-token and $25 per million output-token prices keep it in the premium tier, so it is best reserved for work where capability matters more than unit cost.
Head-to-head pages
Continue Research
This is a buyer-facing summary of the hosted product experience, not a verbatim vendor claim.
For cautious buyers
Privacy guidance is summarized conservatively for buyers and should be checked against the vendor current controls.
| Benchmark | Metric | Axis | Weight | Contribution | Score | Source | Retrieved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Humanity's Last Exam Artificial Analysis HLE: Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, text-only 2,158-question set | Normalized quality input | VALUEQUALITY | VALUE: 40% [SMARTNESS] QUALITY: 55.6% [REASONING] | Contributes 38.3 pts to Value score Contributes 55.6 pts to Quality score | 52.6% | Artificial Analysis Claude Opus 5 evaluation Independent text-only HLE evaluation using adaptive reasoning at maximum effort over the 2,158-question set. | 2026-07-30 |
SWE-Bench Pro Anthropic SWE-Bench Pro: Adaptive Thinking, Max Effort, default sampling, five-trial average |
| Normalized quality input |
QUALITY |
QUALITY: 27.8% [CODING] |
Contributes 27.8 pts to Quality score |
| 79.2% |
| Anthropic Claude Opus 5 system card Vendor-reported SWE-Bench Pro result using adaptive thinking at maximum effort, default sampling settings, averaged over five trials. |
| 2026-07-30 |
Terminal-Bench 2.1 Artificial Analysis Terminal-Bench 2.1: Max Effort | Agentic terminal task completion | Reference only | Not used in Quality or Value scoring. | Informational evidence only. | 89.0% | Artificial Analysis Claude Opus 5 analysis Independent Terminal-Bench 2.1 result for Claude Opus 5 at maximum effort. | 2026-07-30 |
GPQA Diamond Live source acquisition | Normalized quality input | Reference only | Not used in Quality or Value scoring. | Informational evidence only. | 93.2% | Artificial Analysis Claude Opus 5 evaluation Supplementary GPQA evidence is optional and is not a scored PickAI input. | 2026-07-30 |