Skip to content
PickAIModel.com

PickAIModel.com - Compare DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) and MiniMax M2.7

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) vs MiniMax M2.7: pricing, Quality, Value, and benchmarks

Side-by-side buyer comparison built from the current published top 10 snapshot. Quality and Value stay deterministic, while editorial verdict excerpts remain clearly AI-labeled.

Verified evidenceVerified evidence
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) Quality
44.6
MiniMax M2.7 Quality
31.3
Quality delta
+13.3DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads
Value delta
+13.2DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads

Buyer summary

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads Quality by 13.3 points. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads Value by 13.2 points.

Shared roster

Both pages link back to the same published roster and methodology, so the comparison stays on one deterministic evidence set.

Side-by-side summary

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

Open DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
One-line verdict
A cost-efficient frontier challenger for buyers who want strong reasoning, long-context work, and coding evidence without paying Western flagship economics.
Monthly price
DeepSeek API: $0/month
App access
DeepSeek
Conversation benchmark
Free tier
Verified vendor fact

Consumer plan pricing is grounded in the current official vendor plan page.

Verified vendor fact

Hosted app availability is grounded in the current official vendor surface.

Side-by-side summary

MiniMax M2.7

Open MiniMax M2.7
One-line verdict
MiniMax M2.7 is published here because it now has accepted SWE-Bench Pro evidence for the Coding view.
Monthly price
MiniMax Free: $0/month
App access
MiniMax
Conversation benchmark
Free tier
Verified vendor fact

Consumer plan pricing is grounded in the current official vendor plan page.

Verified vendor fact

Hosted app availability is grounded in the current official vendor surface.

Deterministic scores

Quality and Value comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

Q 44.6

V 70.0

Quality rank 7 and value rank 1 in the current published roster.

MiniMax M2.7

Q 31.3

V 56.8

Quality rank 9 and value rank 2 in the current published roster.

Buyer access

Pricing, app access, and Conversation Value

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

Verified vendor fact3K tokens/chat

DeepSeek API: $0/month

Free tier

Hosted app: DeepSeek

MiniMax M2.7

Verified vendor fact3K tokens/chat

MiniMax Free: $0/month

Free tier

Hosted app: MiniMax

Benchmark evidence

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

Verified evidence
  • Humanity's Last Exam

    Normalized quality input

    33.5%

    Artificial Analysis - Humanity's Last Exam evaluation | Third-party benchmark evaluation page used only after the official HLE leaderboard sources fail to yield a usable result.

  • SWE-Bench Pro

    Software engineering task resolution

    55.4%

    BenchLM AI coding leaderboard | Third-party coding leaderboard with exact model rows for SWE-Bench Pro and companion coding benchmarks.

  • GPQA Diamond

    Pass@1

    90.1%

    NVIDIA DeepSeek V4 Pro model card | NVIDIA-hosted model card row for DeepSeek V4 Pro Max; use as sourced provisional benchmark evidence. Retained from the previous published snapshot because the current live source did not expose this benchmark row. Retained from the previous published snapshot because the current live source did not expose this benchmark row.

  • Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Agentic terminal task completion

    67.9%

    NVIDIA DeepSeek V4 Pro model card | NVIDIA-hosted model card row for DeepSeek V4 Pro Max; display as companion agentic coding evidence. Retained from the previous published snapshot because the current live source did not expose this benchmark row. Retained from the previous published snapshot because the current live source did not expose this benchmark row.

Benchmark evidence

MiniMax M2.7

Verified evidence
  • Humanity's Last Exam

    Normalized quality input

    28.1%

    Artificial Analysis - Humanity's Last Exam evaluation | Third-party benchmark evaluation page used only after the official HLE leaderboard sources fail to yield a usable result.

  • Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Agentic terminal task completion

    43.8%

    Terminal-Bench 2.0 official leaderboard | Official Terminal-Bench 2.0 leaderboard. Rows are agent-plus-model results on terminal-bench@2.0 and are verified by a Terminal-Bench team member. Retained from the previous published snapshot because the current live source did not expose this benchmark row. Retained from the previous published snapshot because the current live source did not expose this benchmark row.

Editorial excerpt

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

AI-assisted, editorially reviewed

A cost-efficient frontier challenger for buyers who want strong reasoning, long-context work, and coding evidence without paying Western flagship economics.

Released April 2026, DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) is a serious cost-efficiency challenger for buyers who care about frontier intelligence without frontier infrastructure costs. It competes with leading Western frontier models on complex reasoning, document analysis, and sustained multi-step work, while appearing to require far fewer processing resources for the level of capability delivered. Its strengths are broad versatility: long-context work that stays coherent, useful creative writing, strong coding benchmark evidence, and interactions that feel more thoughtful than formulaic. The caveats are still real: Western models may retain an edge on some narrow coding benchmarks, deeper web-search integration, and enterprise ecosystem maturity, and the low unit cost can encourage enough usage that teams should still watch total volume. Bottom line: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) is frontier-level capability at unusually aggressive economics. If you want one of the smartest models your money can buy, it belongs high on the shortlist.

Editorial excerpt

MiniMax M2.7

AI-assisted, editorially reviewed

MiniMax M2.7 is published here because it now has accepted SWE-Bench Pro evidence for the Coding view.

MiniMax M2.7 is included in the coding leaderboard on the strength of sourced SWE-Bench Pro evidence. The row should be read as coding evidence first; buyer claims beyond pricing, access, and benchmark provenance should stay conservative until refreshed from first-party sources.