Skip to content
PickAIModel.com

PickAIModel.com - Compare Claude Opus 4.8 and MiniMax M3

Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiniMax M3: pricing, Quality, Value, and benchmarks

Side-by-side buyer comparison built from the current published top 10 snapshot. Quality and Value stay deterministic, while editorial verdict excerpts remain clearly AI-labeled.

Verified evidenceProvisional evidence
Claude Opus 4.8 Quality
100.0
MiniMax M3 Quality
59.8
Quality delta
+40.2Claude Opus 4.8 leads
Value delta
-28.3MiniMax M3 leads

Buyer summary

Claude Opus 4.8 leads Quality by 40.2 points. MiniMax M3 leads Value by 28.3 points.

Shared roster

Both pages link back to the same published roster and methodology, so the comparison stays on one deterministic evidence set.

Side-by-side summary

Claude Opus 4.8

Open Claude Opus 4.8
One-line verdict
Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic's newest Opus model, strongest for coding, agentic tasks, and complex professional work where the vendor-reported benchmark evidence applies.
Monthly price
Claude Pro: $20/month
App access
Claude
Conversation benchmark
~392 chats
Editorial estimate

Monthly pricing has not been explicitly sourced in the current snapshot.

Editorial estimate

Hosted app availability has not been explicitly sourced in the current snapshot.

Side-by-side summary

MiniMax M3

Open MiniMax M3
One-line verdict
This model is still under editorial review. We will publish a verdict as soon as we have completed our review of the AI model.
Monthly price
MiniMax Free: $0/month
App access
MiniMax
Conversation benchmark
Free tier
Verified vendor fact

Consumer plan pricing is grounded in the current official vendor plan page.

Verified vendor fact

Hosted app availability is grounded in the current official vendor surface.

Deterministic scores

Quality and Value comparison

Claude Opus 4.8

Q 100.0

V 40.5

Quality rank 1 and value rank 2 in the current published roster.

MiniMax M3

Q 59.8

V 68.8

Quality rank 6 and value rank 1 in the current published roster.

Buyer access

Pricing, app access, and Conversation Value

Claude Opus 4.8

Editorial estimate3K tokens/chat

Claude Pro: $20/month

~392 chats

Hosted app: Claude

MiniMax M3

Verified vendor fact3K tokens/chat

MiniMax Free: $0/month

Free tier

Hosted app: MiniMax

Benchmark evidence

Claude Opus 4.8

Verified evidence
  • Humanity's Last Exam

    Normalized quality input

    49.8%

    Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 release page | Vendor-reported Anthropic Opus 4.8 HLE no-tools score. Do not replace with tools-enabled or adaptive-effort HLE variants.

  • SWE-Bench Pro

    Software engineering task resolution

    69.2%

    Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 release page | Vendor-reported Anthropic Opus 4.8 SWE-Bench Pro score. Do not substitute SWE-Bench Verified.

Benchmark evidence

MiniMax M3

Verified evidence
  • Humanity's Last Exam

    Normalized quality input

    37.1%

    Artificial Analysis - Humanity's Last Exam evaluation | Third-party benchmark evaluation page used only after the official HLE leaderboard sources fail to yield a usable result.

Editorial excerpt

Claude Opus 4.8

AI-assisted, editorially reviewed

Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic's newest Opus model, strongest for coding, agentic tasks, and complex professional work where the vendor-reported benchmark evidence applies.

Released May 28, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic's current flagship and its most capable publicly available model. It is best suited to complex agentic coding, legal and financial document analysis, deep multi-step reasoning, and long-running autonomous tasks. The meaningful upgrades over 4.7 are a dramatic improvement in mathematical reasoning, meaningfully better honesty (it flags its own mistakes rather than quietly moving on), and efficiency gains that mean it uses around 35% fewer output tokens to do the same work — so you actually get a little more for your money despite the unchanged rate card. The honest caveats: it is expensive at $25 per million output tokens, which adds up fast on any high-volume or long-session workflow. On claude.ai, users now have control over the amount of effort Claude puts into a task, but Pro plan rate limits are real and noticeable if you push it hard — heavy users will hit the ceiling. It is also slower than average at inference speed, so it thinks longer before responding. For chat, summarisation, and general Q&A, Sonnet 4.6 covers 90%+ of workloads at 40% lower per-token cost — most buyers do not need Opus for everyday tasks. AnthropicFinout Bottom line: Opus 4.8 is genuinely the best model for serious, sustained, complex work. It is overkill and quietly costly for anything routine — and if you hit the rate limits on a Pro plan, the frustration will feel disproportionate to what you are paying.

Editorial excerpt

MiniMax M3

AI-assisted, editorially reviewed

This model is still under editorial review. We will publish a verdict as soon as we have completed our review of the AI model.

This model is still under editorial review. We will publish a verdict as soon as we have completed our review of the AI model.