Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max): pricing, Quality, Value, and benchmarks

Buyer access

Pricing, app access, and Conversation Value

• Humanity's Last Exam

  Normalized quality input

  39.6%

  Artificial Analysis - Humanity's Last Exam evaluation | Third-party benchmark evaluation page used only after the official HLE leaderboard sources fail to yield a usable result.

• SWE-Bench Pro

  Software engineering task resolution

  64.3%

  DataCamp Claude Opus 4.7 release analysis | Third-party article summarizing vendor-published SWE-Bench Pro launch figures. Treat as vendor-reported until an exact official machine-readable row is available.

• Humanity's Last Exam

  Pass@1

  37.7%

  NVIDIA DeepSeek V4 Pro model card | NVIDIA-hosted model card row for DeepSeek V4 Pro Max; use as sourced provisional benchmark evidence.

• GPQA Diamond

  Pass@1

  90.1%

  NVIDIA DeepSeek V4 Pro model card | NVIDIA-hosted model card row for DeepSeek V4 Pro Max; use as sourced provisional benchmark evidence.

• SWE-Bench Pro

  Software engineering task resolution

  55.4%

  BenchLM AI coding leaderboard | BenchLM May 1, 2026 coding leaderboard row for DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max).

• MRCR v2

  1M long-context

  83.5%

  NVIDIA DeepSeek V4 Pro model card | NVIDIA-hosted model card row for DeepSeek V4 Pro Max.

The most capable generally available Claude today, best for complex analysis, dense documents, images, screenshots, and long-running structured work.

Released April 16, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 is Anthropic's most capable generally available Claude model. It is best suited to complex reasoning, long-running tasks, structured work across documents and spreadsheets, and image-heavy work involving screenshots, diagrams, and detailed documents. The real upgrade over Opus 4.6 is vision quality: higher-resolution image handling makes it much better at small text, dense diagrams, and visual detail that previously came through too blurry to rely on. It also does more verification before reporting back, which reduces confident-but-wrong answers on complex tasks. Its strengths are deep analysis, legal and financial documents, research, and sustained multi-step reasoning. The caveats are meaningful: GPT-5.4 still leads for web-search-heavy tasks, Claude Sonnet remains the better writing pick for many creative workflows, and the new tokenizer can process more tokens for the same input, making effective cost higher than the unchanged rate card suggests. Bottom line: Opus 4.7 is worth it when your work involves complex analysis, dense documents, or images. It is overkill, and quietly more expensive than it looks, for everyday chat and routine writing.

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) is published here because it has sourced SWE-Bench Pro evidence and a sourced DeepSeek V4 Pro model record.

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) is included in the coding leaderboard because current public sources attach it to SWE-Bench Pro, LiveCodeBench, and related coding-agent benchmarks. Treat the row as benchmark evidence first; regulated and sensitive deployments should review DeepSeek policy, hosting, and data controls before use.