Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 Max: Pricing, Quality, Value, and Benchmarks | PickAIModel
PickAIModel.com - Compare Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.7 Max
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 Max: pricing, Quality, Value, and benchmarks
Side-by-side buyer comparison built from the current published top 10 snapshot. Quality and Value stay deterministic, while editorial verdict excerpts remain clearly AI-labeled.
Provisional evidenceVerified evidence
Claude Fable 5.1 Quality
100.0
Qwen3.7 Max Quality
46.5
Quality delta
+53.5Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Value delta
+36.1Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Buyer summary
Claude Fable 5.1 leads Quality by 53.5 points. Claude Fable 5.1 leads Value by 36.1 points.
Shared roster
Both pages link back to the same published roster and methodology, so the comparison stays on one deterministic evidence set.
Anthropic's newest generally available Fable model leads the current scored evidence, with premium $10/$50 token pricing and safeguard fallback for some flagged requests.
Monthly price
Claude Pro: $20/month
App access
Claude
Conversation benchmark
~196 chats
Verified vendor fact
Consumer plan pricing is grounded in the current official vendor plan page.
Verified vendor fact
Hosted app availability is grounded in the current official vendor surface.
Quality rank 1 and value rank 3 in the current published roster.
Qwen3.7 Max
Q 46.5
V 3.9
Quality rank 8 and value rank 10 in the current published roster.
Buyer access
Pricing, app access, and Conversation Value
Claude Fable 5.1
Verified vendor fact3K tokens/chat
Claude Pro: $20/month
~196 chats
Hosted app: Claude
Qwen3.7 Max
Benchmark evidence
Claude Fable 5.1
Verified evidence
Humanity's Last Exam
Normalized quality input
59.1%
Artificial Analysis Claude Fable 5.1 evaluation | Independent HLE result using adaptive reasoning at maximum effort with Anthropic default safeguard fallback.
SWE-Bench Pro
Normalized quality input
81.2%
Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1 system card | Vendor-reported SWE-Bench Pro result using adaptive thinking at maximum effort and default sampling settings.
Terminal-Bench 2.1
Agentic terminal task completion
91.4%
Artificial Analysis Claude Fable 5.1 analysis | Independent Terminal-Bench 2.1 result using adaptive reasoning at maximum effort with default safeguard fallback.
GPQA Diamond
Normalized quality input
Editorial excerpt
Claude Fable 5.1
AI-assisted, editorially reviewed
Anthropic's newest generally available Fable model leads the current scored evidence, with premium $10/$50 token pricing and safeguard fallback for some flagged requests.
Claude Fable 5.1 combines the strongest current locked-variant HLE and SWE-Bench Pro evidence with a 1M-token context window. Its $10 per million input-token and $50 per million output-token prices make it a specialist choice for difficult coding and knowledge work, while safeguard fallback means integrations should surface the model identity returned by the API.
Editorial excerpt
Qwen3.7 Max
AI-assisted, editorially reviewed
Qwen3.7 Max is the optimal choice when your pipeline demands rigorous, multi-step logical deduction, complex code generation, or scientific analysis, and when cost-efficiency at scale is a primary constraint.
Continue Research
Move from the head-to-head page back into the full roster.
Qwen3.7 Max is the optimal choice when your pipeline demands rigorous, multi-step logical deduction, complex code generation, or scientific analysis, and when cost-efficiency at scale is a primary constraint.
Monthly price
Qwen Chat: Price unavailable
App access
Qwen Chat
Conversation benchmark
Free tier
Verified vendor fact
Consumer plan pricing was not available in the current snapshot.
Verified vendor fact
Hosted app availability is grounded in the current official vendor surface.
Verified vendor fact
3K tokens/chat
Qwen Chat: Price unavailable
Free tier
Hosted app: Qwen Chat
93.7%
Artificial Analysis Claude Fable 5.1 evaluation
Benchmark evidence
Qwen3.7 Max
Verified evidence
Humanity's Last Exam
Normalized quality input
41.4%
Alibaba Cloud Qwen3.7 launch article | Alibaba Cloud/Qwen official launch article. Treat HLE as vendor-reported evidence.
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
14.1
Artificial Analysis AA-Omniscience evaluation | Independent Artificial Analysis result for Qwen3.7 Max. Display-only; this row does not affect Quality or Value scores.
SWE-Bench Pro
Normalized quality input
60.6%
Alibaba Cloud Qwen3.7 launch article | Alibaba Cloud/Qwen official launch article. Treat SWE-Pro as vendor-reported evidence for SWE-Bench Pro.
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Agentic terminal task completion
69.7%
Alibaba Cloud Qwen3.7 launch article | Official Qwen/Alibaba launch material. Terminal-Bench 2.0-Terminus value is developer-reported.
Qwen3.7 Max is the optimal choice when your pipeline demands rigorous, multi-step logical deduction, complex code generation, or scientific analysis, and when cost-efficiency at scale is a primary constraint.